The Best Songs about Las Vegas

By guest author Samantha Black:

The best songs about Las Vegas
Because Las Vegas is such an iconic city, it makes sense that there would be a large number of songs written about it. The bright lights, 24/7 party atmosphere, luxurious hotels, and world-class gaming available in Vegas makes it a city unlike any other in the world. Whether you are packing for a trip to the city, or even just planning on improving your poker playing skills at playpokerfree.com prior to trying your luck at the Vegas tables sometime in the future, have a listen to a few of the best songs about Las Vegas – they will certainly help to get you in the mood.

 

Viva Las Vegas

 

Written in 1964 by Mort Shuman and Doc Pomus, “Viva Las Vegas” might very well be the most famous song with Las Vegas at its heart. Elvis Presley recorded it for his film of the same name, which was one of the most popular films he ever made. The song has been covered by a wide variety of artists over the years.

 

Don’t Make Me Come to Vegas

 

“Don’t Make Me Come to Vegas” is a song off Tori Amos’ 2002 concept album, Scarlet’s Walk. The song is written from the point of view of Amos’ Scarlet character, and involves her getting a phone call from her beloved niece, who is having trouble with her man; Scarlet threatens to come to Vegas and yank her right from his bed.

 

Luck Be a Lady

 

We’ve all heard of Lady Luck and nowhere is she better personified than in Frank Sinatra’s “Luck Be a Lady.” Interestingly, though he made it famous, Sinatra didn’t originally perform the song, which was written in 1950 by Frank Loesser. It was originally performed by Robert Alda, and was featured in the musical Guys and Dolls. The song reminds us that in Las Vegas, anything can happen and that luck really needs to be a lady!

 

Leaving Las Vegas

 

“Leaving Las Vegas” is the song that made Sheryl Crow famous, and was Crow’s first hit single in the United States. Crow wrote the song along with David Baerwald, Bill Bottrell, David Ricketts, Kevin Gilbert, and Brian McLeod and it appeared on her debut album, Tuesday Night Music Club back in 1994. The video features Elvis impersonators and plenty of showgirls, and reminds us that while glamorous, there is a rough side to Sin City as well.

 

Vegas

 

There are two groups of people in this world: those that love the sound of Nico’s voice and those that hate it. Although there are a lot of people that probably haven’t heard the late singer’s “Vegas” (released in 1981), it is an essential Las Vegas song. A little dark and a little sad, Nico gives herself over to this song completely as only she could, and reminds us all that life is just one big gamble.

 

While the five songs listed above are essential Las Vegas songs, it must be stated that there are actually hundreds of songs out there that mention the city. Artists including Tom Waits, The B-52s, Robbie Williams, the Cocteau Twins, Dean Martin, and many others have written or performed songs about Las Vegas. In the end, it is really a matter of personal taste when it comes to deciding what the best songs about Las Vegas actually are.

 

 

Posted in Music, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Spambot Updates: Next steps, account activation testing

We are taking the next step in our spambot experimentation, it begins today. We are once again completely resetting the test forums. The main change for this next round is to see how many bots can get past email activation.
To be clear (again), email activation is when the forum system sends the newly registered member a link to click in an email. Unless the link is clicked, the account will not become active.

CAPTCHA image will be set at a minimum difficulty.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Spam Research | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Next steps: How Spambots use email

Our most recent bit of research is looking at how spambots use the email addresses that we register. We want to find out if spambots attend the email addresses they register at and if they are using real persons email addresses (to avoid bounces).

We sent out an email to every registered spambot, that’s 225,690 bots (almost a quarter-million) asking that if there was a person at the email address that they reply.

This experiment did not go very well. Surprisingly, we did not receive a single reply from a bot, but we did receive about four replies from real people. Our SMTP server was barely able to handle the load of sending these emails, indeed for several days our server was crashing because it continually ran out of disk space due to the logs that were being collected.

The majority of the errors we received from sending email were related to the fact that the domain did not exist. Secondary issues were messages about the user’s inbox being too full.

Unfortunately, due to the issues we met, we were unable to get a true count of how many emails bounced or were blocked versus what went through. We plan on retrying this if we can find a SMTP host that would handle this kind of load for free. We may attempt to use Gmail, a reputable email agent much more capable than us.

 

Posted in Computer Stuff, Spam Research, Web Services, Application, and Design | Leave a comment

How to discern convincing spam from real comments

SPAM is becoming more and more convincing. After years of dealing with it, it never occurred to me that to new site owners it can be very difficult to tell convincing spam from real messages. Computers are becoming better at this than people ever were or might ever be —

no spam!

no spam! (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

even I occasionally get tricked.

A site I’ve helped set up as a community project recently had a comment come in. It is new and is receiving its first spam messages (though we already have methods in place to protect the site from spam). The site owner ran across a comment that does indeed look real, but to the experienced SPAM expert (such as myself) it clearly is spam.

The comment left by the spammer:
Name: Heather E. Nelson
Website link provided: businesstraveltours.com x
Email provided: melm2067@gmail.com *
IP posted from: 174.139.13.179 *
(*Spammers do not deserve privacy).
The message:
“Woah! I’m really loving the template/theme of this site. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very hard to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and appearance. I must say you have done a amazing job with this. In addition, the blog loads super quick for me on Firefox. Exceptional Blog!
http://www.businesstraveltours.com is my website.”

Looks like a nice complement, right? Wrong. But, don’t worry if you didn’t get why, here are some steps you can go through to determine if a comment is spam:

i. The name of the commenter. Spam
messages will often have a company or product name instead of a human
name. In the case of this message, the name
appears legitimate.

ii. The link on the comment. A spam
commenter will always post a link, either in the “Link”
field or in the comment itself. You can check the link out to see if it
looks like it goes to a legitimate service. This is where I knew that
the comment above was spam. The company it
links to, “Business Travel Tours”, is not a legitimate site. You can
look up site trustworthiness here: http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/www.businesstraveltours.com

 

 

(just copy/paste the link found in the comment into the search in the upper right-hand corner).
(You can also install the addon called MyWot on just about any browser, check out their page on how to do this. That way, you can verify the legitimacy of any website on the Internet).

iii. The content of the comment. Often spam comments will not relate
to the article it was posted to. Lately, more spammers have been
posting very generalized spam, such as the message above — it could fit into just about any article/page because it is a
comment about the whole site and how it looks.

iv. The email address. Spammers sometimes have real or fake emails that are either active or inactive. The email address above looks plenty legitimate. Sometimes spammers will have completely random addresses made up of nonsense letters and numbers. This is becoming less common than it used to be

Over time as you get more spam, you will start to immediately recognize when something is not right. I find it fascinating how spambots operate and how good they are getting and I hope that you too will begin to see how that is significant.

Do you have examples of tricky spam? How do you go about figuring if it is real or computer generated? How much spam do you get?

Posted in Computer Stuff, Spam Research, Web Services, Application, and Design | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Spam Research: Experiment Continued on SMF Forum

A continuation of the Spambot Experiment with an SMF forum, read about the first experiment here: https://zylblog.com/2011/12/spambot-experiment/

The forums were completely wiped out on the 24th of December (all registered members were deleted, all posts removed, etc). A few options were changed: Guest posting was enabled. Registration verification was disabled. User threshold was decreased to 1 minute for accurate bot timekeeping.

Just a heads up: the next experiment is what I expect to yield more results. I plan on disabling Cloudflare, my preliminary blocking agent (blocks at the DNS level. Everything recorded up to this point is research that had that preliminary block on, blocking the most prominent and oldest bots.

The total view: 161307 Posts in 130008 Topics by 132563 Members on 3/11/2012.

Yearly Summary New Topics New Posts New Members Most Online Page views
March 2012 30058 37451 29187 56 883558
 February 2012 65955 83500 66795 43 1881278
 January 2012 28404 34489 31299 38 930937

Interestingly, now that I’ve set the threshold for user time online so that one single action counts for at most one minute, there are still bots that register abnormally high times online:

Most Time Online

dentalokdee
9d 22h 21m
Cassuggex
1d 8h 59m
Melofapr
11h 2m
Gevaoccache
10h 17m
NatashaTon
9h 24m
BackloFF
9h 17m
Nityenenturse
7h 23m
naxernada
4h 33m
Enrimicrilles
4h 8m
Badgaper
3h 59m

 

I have a hard time imagining how these numbers are even possible, it seems like a major waste of resources to allow a bot to stay on any given site for so long. It seems to me that the most a bot should do is go to the site, register (if necessary), post the spam, and move on to the next site to cover as much as possible.

Likewise, many topics have an abnormal view count (probably only from a single bot replying to its own topics multiple times).

Top ten topics by replies and views:

Top 10 Topics (by Views)

Quick question regarding disyllabic and unbosomed
24771
flash èãðû
21787
055 – prices buy hennessy cognac haltom pharmacy tx
9043
ugg boots
5575
ultram er side effects Yonkers
5494
tramadol with no prescription Latham
5085
binaryoptionstradingflaus.com top rated binary choices investing critiques in the environment.
3425
free erotice hentai hentai men
3073
cheap Celexa buy cod
2063
uggs norway
1802

 

Top 10 Topics (by Replies)

ugg boots
4759
055 – prices buy hennessy cognac haltom pharmacy tx
3109
ultram er side effects Yonkers
2701
free erotice hentai hentai men
2273
cheap Celexa buy cod
1854
uggs norway
1371
This Super!
650
Quick question regarding disyllabic and unbosomed
498
archeoligy dating
447
All Casino Grand Hotel Reviews
395

Top ten posters and topic starters are identical:

Top Topic Starters

Enrimicrilles
18365
delaccomypl
17627
epherturl
8012
addicduck
5033
RichardMaretti
4278
Perettos
2478
coapypedyday
2240
Philerlige
2193
Albertius
1887
BreariacanO
165

 

Top 10 Posters

Enrimicrilles
18365
delaccomypl
17627
epherturl
8012
addicduck
5033
RichardMaretti
4278
Perettos
2478
coapypedyday
2240
Philerlige
2193
Albertius
1887
BreariacanO
1651

Summary statistics:

General Statistics

Total Members:
132563
Total Posts:
161307
Total Topics:
130008
Most Online:
81 – December 23, 2011, 09:12:35 am (note, this is still prior to the beginning of the second set of experiments)
Online Today:
56
Total page views:
3865188
Average registrations per day:
783.35
Average posts per day:
1070.14
Average topics per day:
890.99
Average online per day:
26.75
Male to Female Ratio:
20167:1
Average page views per day:
19620.24

 

Conclusion: Interesting.

Next, Cloudflare’s anti-spam technology is going to be disabled completely.

Posted in Spam Research, Web Services, Application, and Design | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Digital or Acoustic Piano?

Whenever I visit Costco, the first place I go is right to the keyboards. Its funny because I never actually like any of them, I play the same song on each one (a very cheesy love song). As of yet, I haven’t had a digital piano “wow” me and my overly sensitive ears. What I intend to tackle in this article is: When is a digital piano right for me? What advantages will I find in an acoustic piano?

The fundamental difference:
An acoustic piano uses hammers hitting strings to produce sound.
Technical bit: It is not considered a “string” instrument because you are not touching the strings. A piano is considered a percussion instrument.
The quality of the sound roughly narrows down to the quality of the key mechanism (how responsive the keys are — that is to say, the “touch”. Some pianos have very little expression in their touch, some have much more). The quality of the soundboard (perhaps considered the most important part, quality differs from kind of wood, to how the wood was cut and glued, to the direction and fineness of the grain). And the quality of the instrument overall (things like what the case is made out of, how well the parts were built and put together, etc).

A digital piano or keyboard has different features and characteristics that set it aside from the piano.
The sound of a digital piano is being reproduced by a digitally sampled sound for each note, taken from a real piano in high quality recording.
Technical bit: We’ll be referring mainly to when a digital keyboard is imitating the sounds of a piano. In truth, a digital keyboard can replicate often many different instruments, a feature we will discuss later.
The quality of the sound, like the acoustic cousin, has many factors. The key mechanism, like the acoustic piano, matters greatly. Some digital pianos have touch response, others do not. Likewise, some digital pianos have “weighted keys” whereas others are not at all. Quality of the key mechanism and type matter greatly in choosing a digital piano.
More important in the actual sound is the sample rate and overall quality. This differs on every keyboard, and unfortunately there is no number you can simply look for on the box before purchase to figure this out.
The speakers that come with the digital piano make a big difference as well. Once again, there is no set thing that you can simply look for.

When is acoustic right for me?
When you are planning to live in one place for an extended period of time.
When real sound makes a difference to your ears.
When you do have the money to purchase a piano, new or used, and can afford regular tuning. Or, if you already have access to an acoustic piano (eg: parents/grand parents have a piano they no longer want and are giving away) and the people to move it properly.

When is digital right for me?
When you are moving a lot, or playing in a live band and need an instrument you can take with you.
When you want a maintenance-free device.
When you want synthesizer sounds or an MIDI controller in addition to a piano.

I have kids learning to play piano, what should I look for?
If going digital, make should you have a sustain pedal and touch-sensitive keys. If going acoustic, make sure that everything works — all keys, all pedals, and that the hammer felts are not entirely worn. You should talk to your kids piano instructor about their thoughts as well.

Acoustic thoughts:
Acoustic pianos do require tuning. Tuning in the home environment should be done about once a year. Tuning costs vary by location and also by individual tuners. After moving a piano, you will likely need to get a pitch raise, and a full tuning a few weeks later. My tuner charges $70 for a pitch raise, and $90 for a tuning.

Used acoustic pianos can be found for free in many places; however, a free piano is not always a worthwhile piano. The best way to find out how good an acoustic piano if you are not a pianist is to find a pianist and ask them to go along with you to try the piano out. If you do not know a pianist, you can hire a technician to come and look at the piano, and give you an idea about the value and quality of the piano.

There are different kinds of acoustic pianos. The major categories are upright and grand. Inside those categories are even more sizes. Grand pianos can be divided into: parlor studio, baby, concert, and a few other sizes in-between. Upright can be “upright”, upright grand, console, and spinet. (Read here for more details about uprights). Upright grands are typically antiques built around the earlier 1900’s. How good they are depends on their past care and the quality of the builder. Antique pianos are worth less, pianos do not improve with time.

Get a real piano bench. A chair is not suitable for playing piano and will cause bad posture and interfere with proper technique. If a solid hardwood surface is too uncomfortable for you, consider using a small pillow. Do not use antique piano stools — they are beautiful as heck and make excellent decorations, and those claw-feet are marvelous to look at, but piano benches are impractical and do not allow for a full range of motion. Stools are not appropriate for a bench either.

 

Digital Thoughts:
Some digital pianos have no touch response — literally, no matter how hard or soft you press the keys, there may be no difference in sound. When searching for a digital piano, touch sensitive keys are a must — this allows for expression. Many cheaper digital pianos have unweighted keys, which feel significantly different from that of an acoustic piano. Weighted keys are expensive, but will make the transition between acoustic and digital pianos easier and allow for more expression.

Many digital pianos also lack pedals. In acoustic pianos, the middle-pedal in more expensive grand pianos does a complicated thing that is not so important in modern music. The sustain pedal, however, is used in most types of piano music and is very important to have. It holds out notes without the need to press keys. A left-pedal is nice, but not absolutely necessary (the left pedal, the “damper pedal”, softens the sound).

Digital pianos of higher quality take a “console” approach. These are built into stands with better speakers placed inside, and the pedals are permanently attached. Digital pianos of this type are often a level above the standard portable keyboard, but come with a price and less portability.

Read what I wrote about benches in Acoustic Thoughts again. Digital pianos often fail to come with benches, and even more, the stools that they come with seem to be at odd heights. There is no standard height, but playing and sitting at the piano should be comfortable for you.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Music | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Spambot Experiment

On August 28, 2011, I started a spambot experiment on my website.
One inaccuracy that I want to clear up before I begin posting the results: About a month or so into the experiment, I changed the difficulty of the the CAPTCHA image from the default (“Medium”) to easy (overlapping letters and numbers). It does not change the fact that the trap, a forum, was still spammed like heck.
One other note is that my DNS provider blocks major spammers automatically, excluding many before a lookup even occurs.

The setup: One SMF forum with no modifications on a directory that was not published elsewhere on the web. (You could not search for this forum). Guest posting was not allowed on this forum (but I might try guest posting out to see the increase). What was required for registration: Standard acceptance to agreement. Username. Email address. Password. “Easy” captcha image. Attachments were not allowed, since I just don’t think I can handle that kind of bandwidth.

As of 12/24/2011, the trap forum contained 49457 Posts in 45471 Topics by 21747 spammers.

Average spammer registrations per day:
182.75
Average spam posts per day:
415.70
Average spam topics per day:
382.20
Average spammers online per day:
26.47
Registration of spammers Male to Female Ratio:
1:0
Growth of spammers:

Forum History (using forum time offset)

Yearly Summary New Topics New Posts New Members Most Online
2011 45482 49468 21747 81
December 2011 32814 33915 14939 81
November 2011 11989 13695 5079 49
October 2011 620 1798 1534 18
September 2011 55 56 189 7
August 2011 4 4 6 2

One might think that spambots typically just register, spam once or twice, and leave forever, but this seems not to be the case for all. Indeed, many of the spammers returned multiple times. When these statistics were recorded, the user threshold timer was 15 minutes. This means that, per each logon, a minimum of 15 minutes activity was recorded. (I’ll reduce this for the next experiment). The record-holding bots were as follows, I’ve included how many posts were made by the top bots: Continue reading

Posted in Computer Stuff, Programs and Software, Spam Research, Web Services, Application, and Design | 1 Comment

Best support answer ever

Take a read on Google Chrome support, read the question, and the “Best Answer”.
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=73c3a0e0c96cdbfd

Edit: This answer has since changed. A copy of the original “best answer” can be seen here, quite funny:
http://i.imgur.com/7cWDe.jpg

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Type in: “Let it Snow” on Google Search, and it will do just that.

Type: “Let it Snow” (w/out quotations) into Google, and it will do just that.
(Also try: “Do a barrel roll”)

(These may not work in Internet Explorer or outdated browsers)

Posted in Personal Blog | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Did you know? If you Middle-Click a FireFox tab, it will close.

Posted in Computer Stuff, Programs and Software | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment