Comparison of Adobe Reader, Foxit Reader, and SumatraPDF Reader Resources

This chart compares Adobe Reader, Foxit Reader, and SumatraPDF from a standpoint of the installer size, the installation size left on the disk (as measured in C:\Program Files) and the amount of memory usage the programs use while running idle.

(Continue reading to see some really fancy charts)

PDF readers running idle with no documents:

Size of Installer Installation Size Memory Usage
Adobe Reader (10.1.4) 48.49MB 110MB 36.9MB (*1)
Foxit Reader (5.4.2) 14.92 39.6MB 18.47MB
Sumatra PDF (2.1.1) 4.21MB 8.19MB 3.12MB

Virtual memory initially used by all these programs was trivial, less than 500KB in each instance
*1 Adobe Reader opens two separate processes, this is the total of both of them
The same PDF Readers with a 2.48MB PDF Document Open (Graphics and text)

Memory Usage with a 2.48MB Document Open
Adobe Reader (10.1.4) 59.4MB (*1)
Foxit Reader (5.4.2) 19.39MB
Sumatra PDF (2.1.1) 48.07MB

About Jesse Zylstra

Hey! My name is Jesse Zylstra, and I am the administrator of this website. I used to write about free software and programs, online web applications, and new technology -- especially open-source. Now I just write udder nonsense. I also play pipe organ, which I'm told is a fun and interesting fact about me. In the past, I studied network administration. Now I've been trying to pursue a real fake bachelors degree for the last, oh, 10 years or so.
This entry was posted in Computer Stuff, Programs and Software and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.